{"id":1757,"date":"2025-06-13T00:14:17","date_gmt":"2025-06-13T00:14:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/13\/gorsuch-warns-supreme-court-decision-gives-irs-powerful-new-tool-to-avoid-accountability\/"},"modified":"2025-06-13T00:14:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-13T00:14:17","slug":"gorsuch-warns-supreme-court-decision-gives-irs-powerful-new-tool-to-avoid-accountability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/13\/gorsuch-warns-supreme-court-decision-gives-irs-powerful-new-tool-to-avoid-accountability\/","title":{"rendered":"Gorsuch warns Supreme Court decision gives IRS \u2018powerful new tool to avoid accountability\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a dissent to the Supreme Court\u2019s decision to limit the U.S. Tax Court&#8217;s authority in certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) cases, asserting that the federal tax collecting service could avoid accountability in the future.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">Gorsuch wrote the dissent to the high court&#8217;s opinion in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, a case that centers on Jennifer Zuch&#8217;s dispute with the IRS that began in 2012 over the agency\u2019s moves regarding her late 2010 federal tax return filing.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Along the way, the Court\u2019s decision hands the IRS a powerful new tool to avoid accountability for its mistakes in future cases like this one,&#8217; Gorsuch wrote in his dissent.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, Zuch claimed that the IRS made a mistake, crediting a $50,000 payment to her then-husband\u2019s account instead of her own. The IRS disagreed and sought to collect her unpaid taxes with a levy to seize and sell her property.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Over the years after the dispute began, Zuch filed several annual tax returns showing overpayments. Instead of being issued refunds, the IRS applied these to her outstanding 2010 tax liability.<\/p>\n<p>Once the IRS settled Zuch\u2019s outstanding sum, her liability reached zero, and the IRS no longer had a reason to levy her property.<\/p>\n<p>The IRS then moved to dismiss Zuch\u2019s case in Tax Court, arguing that Tax Court lacked jurisdiction since there was no longer a levy on her property. The Tax Court agreed.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court upheld that Tax Court no longer had jurisdiction without a levy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Because there was no longer a proposed levy, the Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to resolve questions about Zuch\u2019s disputed tax liability,&#8217; read the high court\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n<p>The decision will not only prevent Zuch from recouping her overpayments that she believes the IRS has wrongly retained, but give the IRS a way to avoid accountability, Gorsuch wrote in his dissent.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The IRS seeks, and the Court endorses, a view of the law that gives that agency a roadmap for evading Tax Court review and never having to answer a taxpayer\u2019s complaint that it has made a mistake,&#8217; the justice wrote.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a dissent to the Supreme Court\u2019s decision to limit the U.S. Tax Court&#8217;s authority in certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) cases, asserting that the federal tax collecting service could avoid accountability in the future. Gorsuch wrote the dissent to the high court&#8217;s opinion in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, a&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1758,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1757"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1757\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1758"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victoryinfinance.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}